Do golf's governing bodies really know where the game appears to be going? Is it stumbling in the same direction that tennis did some twenty-thirty years ago when it fell off the earth in popularity? I hope not, but if it is, the reasons are different. The major culprit driving golf from a thriving sport to one that is struggling to hold its own in participation is the building of longer golf courses in order to keep up with today's equipment improvements. The reason...to protect scoring.

I am one of those who also believes that a par 5 should require three shots to reach (that's why it is a par 5) or, on occasion, two shots if the player hits a great drive and uses a long club for the second, but still at some risk. When a player reaches a 540 yard hole with a drive and a seven iron, something just doesn't seem right, but that is happening.

To protect the scoring challenge new courses are being built longer and old ones renovated to be longer. The examples are disturbing. I am talking lots of courses, including great ones like The Old Course at St. Andrews, Augusta National, Winged Foot, etc. Is that supposed to be telling the world that these aren't great courses anymore? Well it certainly seems so…but it really isn't true. They are still great courses, providing the new equipment isn't overpowering them. Changing the courses by adding length is the wrong answer. Here is why.

Longer courses mean more land is required to build them ($$$), more equipment and materials to maintain them ($$$), more staff to care for them ($$$), more time to play them (meaning fewer rounds and the need for a greater fee) ($$$). Because of this, the cost of golf has to escalate. The cost in money and in time loom as the two primary reasons why people drop out of the game or never start. And as the old saying goes, "Time is money."

So what is the answer? The first one that most people come up with is simply to reduce the distance the ball can go so as stop the need for lengthening. While that may seem easy, it has some red flags largely because of the potential litigation from manufacturers. The average player would also resist at first, but not if the hole lengths were shortened to accommodate the ball's reduction. (I would personally like to see it.)

Another is to tighten the fairways particularly in the long hitter's zone and lengthen the rough for tournaments. This would definitely reduce some of the low handicapper and pro advantage. And a final way is to forget trying to protect scoring. Let them shoot in the fifties, have a good time, play faster and cheaper.

But don't price the game out of business by sticking to lengthening the courses. It is the wrong solution for the greatest game ever played.

To comment to this blog, click here.