by pro1984
I think you should get your facts right , amateurs only have to change to v grooves in 2024 , if you intend to still be playing those same taylormade irons , good luck

by golfer_guy
I think the USGA are a bunch of old men who have nothing better to do with their time than tinker around with things. I mean have you seen David Faye, the guy is a bag of dust with teeth. They are ruining golf as much as protecting it, look a the way they set up the Us Open to the point where it is (goofy golf). And I suppose these grooves will be legal until another Tiger or Phil come along spinning spinning wedges out of the rough, what then, no grooves?

by Ron The Hacker
Golf Chick, I’m afraid I’m going to have to disagree with you this time. You can check out the USGA website (http://usga.org) for specifics of their proposal, but in a nutshell the USGA is proposing to restrict specs on the groves of golf clubs manufactured after 1 Jan 2010. The key for most of us is the fact that they’re going to enforce the change in competitions only involving ‘highly skilled players’. I would take that to mean competitions such as the U.S. Amateur for which a golfer must have a handicap of 2.4 or lower to even enter. For the rest of us ‘hacker’s (read that as ‘not highly skilled’), ‘for golf clubs already in use and/or manufactured prior to the proposed rule implementation date, ... the USGA proposes to allow their use for a lengthy period of time (at least 10 years)’. So that would put us out to beyond 2020 before we ‘not so skilled players’ have to really worry about spending the big bucks to buy our next set of clubs.
Now I’m just a golfing hacker (check out my blog at http://golfinghacker.com), but I for one endorse the change. Why, you ask? I guess I’m just a purist at heart. Hardly a pro tournament goes by without a measured long drive of over 400 yards. The pros are hitting the golf ball further than ever with decreasing accuracy in terms of fairways hit. In other words, they’re letting it all hang out knowing that even if they miss the fairway, they can get bite on the ball with their “U” grooves and get it ‘up and down’ from the rough (unless the rough is U.S. Open length). Now if a player can hit a 300+ yard drive down the middle, more power to him (or her). But if that same drive strays off the fairway and into the rough, there should be some penalty. And at this point, if you’re still asking why I would endorse the proposed change, you need to drag out your Merriam-Webster and look up the meaning of ‘purist’.
The Hacker

by USNavyChiefRet
Yep! Purist? You can't even spell "groves" (grooves). What, do you hit it down the middle of a orange grove? It's just another way that Europe (the R&A) can come over here and impose their "purist" restrictions on America! That's like having the technology to do word processing using a computer & "MS Word" or "Word Perfect" but you have this ole manual typewriter so you will use it instead because your a "purist". Come on, the golf club manufacturers are already counting the money their going to make on this deal! Get real!

by TartanGolfGrips DotCom
I'm with ya 100% Kristin - just give the lawnmowers a couple of weeks off leading up to the PGA Tournaments...
The crux of the issue that I've been reading is the scoring propensity from the rough using the U-grooves...
Let it grow so it's up over your ankles, and then lets see who can spin the ball on the green too much...