William K. Wolfrum - Latest Comments on If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Shanks [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Shanks [Visitor] — Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:13:31 +0000

June,

Excellent comments. Lopez had the greatest LPGA rookie year of all time, no doubt. But she had been to college and was a little older than Creamer. Pak had been a pro for a little while before coming to America and also was a little older, but nonetheless it was an awesome rookie start. Creamer won her first of 3 tournaments BEFORE she got out of high school. Also incredible. And Wie stands to be even more sensational if she learns how to close the deal, which I expect she will.

Norman [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Norman [Visitor] — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:09:59 +0000

William, I really hope most of the players won't go down the Maxim route.

I think we know Natalie is very much gone that way anyway, but I really hope some of the other girls have a bit more substance to them than that.

Leave the slut thing to Britney and Christina.

William K. Wolfrum [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

William K. Wolfrum [Visitor] — Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:26:59 +0000

My God, you guys can be catty. I love it.

In regards to some of your comments, I imagine it will be a tightrope for the LPGA to walk. They could take the moral high ground and avoid the hotness factor the new girls are bringing with them, or the entire tour could become a big spread for Maxim magazine.

I'm really on the fence with this one.

--WKW

Jim Coulthard [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Jim Coulthard [Visitor] — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:48:24 +0000

JUNE In one sense, Paula's season is unprecedented. No one else has won an LPGA multiround tournament at such a young age. Unfortunately, for certain Creamer fans that gives Wie nearly 3 years to break the one LPGA record that Paula Creamer holds. Even Chris Baldwin seems to lack confidence that the girl who hasn't learned to win won't become the youngest ever winner on the LPGA.

Jeff [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Jeff [Visitor] — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 21:30:56 +0000

I'm sure Morgan will be hoping Michelle will be having lots of success and much good luck.

NOT.

What actually happened with her and Michelle anyway. I heard she said some bad stuff about Michelle but can't remember what.

alan [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

alan [Visitor] — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:12:22 +0000

I suppose everyone has some redeeming features. I hadn't noticed Morgan's.
I get too distracted by the sour face.
I would love to see the expression next Wednesday morning when Wie is on TV announcing turning professional and raking in the $10 million.
That would be priceless, for everything else there's Mastercard.

Alan M

Jeff [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

Jeff [Visitor] — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 01:41:50 +0000

Alan
"She's a bitch to put it mildly.
I didn't really want to say it."

But Alan keep two things in mind:
1. she has a big chest.
2. she always puts her hand on her butt before you strikes a putt. Don't know why she does this but hey.

June [Visitor] in response to: If Michelle Wie is the new Tiger, will more benefit this time?

June [Visitor] — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:14:33 +0000

People talk about Puala like she is having this crazyily amazing rookie season. I agree that she is a great talent but some of poster is delusional if they think Paula's year is unprecedented. You don't even have to go 10 years and I recall Se Ri's truly maing rookie year (2 win and 2 major at that) and Karie Webb's. Don't even mention Nancy's 9 wins. So be reasonable here when you drrol over Paula's game.