William K. Wolfrum - Latest Comments on Tiger Woods the epitome of today's non-activist athlete http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum?disp=comments en-US-utf8 http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Peter Nevins [Visitor] in response to: Tiger Woods the epitome of today's non-activist athlete Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:58:08 +0000 Peter Nevins [Visitor] c56668@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/ Your point is well made. And golf has to have some of the most conservative politics of any sport! But I can understand, when you are as strapped for cash as Tiger must be, there's no room for speaking your mind... http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/12/13/tiger_woods_the_epitome_of_today_s_non_a#c56668 Alex [Visitor] in response to: Tiger Woods the epitome of today's non-activist athlete Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:10:44 +0000 Alex [Visitor] c56665@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/ WKW,<br /> <br /> I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.<br /> <br /> If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?<br /> <br /> And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"
I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.

If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?

And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"]]> http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/12/13/tiger_woods_the_epitome_of_today_s_non_a#c56665 Alex [Visitor] in response to: Tiger Woods the epitome of today's non-activist athlete Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:09:34 +0000 Alex [Visitor] c56664@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/ WKW,<br /> <br /> I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.<br /> <br /> If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?<br /> <br /> And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"
I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.

If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?

And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"]]> http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/12/13/tiger_woods_the_epitome_of_today_s_non_a#c56664