<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/4.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>William K. Wolfrum - Latest Comments on Sports Illustrated doesn't find Tiger Woods fun to watch</title>
		<link>http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=4486" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US-utf8</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=4.0.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title> kickrocks [Visitor] in response to: Sports Illustrated doesn't find Tiger Woods fun to watch</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kickrocks [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c52331@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>I like watching him. more than Diana Taurasi, tho im sure shes a very nice girl.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like watching him. more than Diana Taurasi, tho im sure shes a very nice girl.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/06/13/sports_illustrated_doesn_t_find_tiger_wo#c52331</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title> Marc [Visitor] in response to: Sports Illustrated doesn't find Tiger Woods fun to watch</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Marc [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c52170@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>I looked at the same gallery yesterday and went through all 32 expecting Tiger to be next; and was quite disappointed when he was not even on the list.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I looked at the same gallery yesterday and went through all 32 expecting Tiger to be next; and was quite disappointed when he was not even on the list.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/06/13/sports_illustrated_doesn_t_find_tiger_wo#c52170</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Ron Mon [Member] in response to: Sports Illustrated doesn't find Tiger Woods fun to watch</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ron Mon [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c52150@http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/</guid>
			<description>The verb is &quot;to taekwondong.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enthralling, exhilarating, enchanting, exasperating, but never fun.  That&#039;s Tiger Woods.  Mr. boring, the surgeon, the Tell-Tale Heart-napper.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The verb is "to taekwondong."<br />
<br />
Enthralling, exhilarating, enchanting, exasperating, but never fun.  That's Tiger Woods.  Mr. boring, the surgeon, the Tell-Tale Heart-napper.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/william.wolfrum/2007/06/13/sports_illustrated_doesn_t_find_tiger_wo#c52150</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
