« Roger Clemens, Miguel Tejada, Barry Bonds named in Mitchell Report - is golf listening?Tiger Woods unfazed by sexy "reporter"; deals with much stupider questions »

3 comments

  1. § Alex Email said on :
    WKW,

    I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.

    If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?

    And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"
  2. § Alex Email said on :
    WKW,

    I should be used to the hyperbole employed by you liberals, but one sentence in your blog needs further explanation.

    If Tiger were to express his political preference publicly, how would that put his livelihood at risk?

    And how would his voting (or not voting) be of importance to "the fate of the nation?"
  3. § Peter Nevins said on :
    Your point is well made. And golf has to have some of the most conservative politics of any sport! But I can understand, when you are as strapped for cash as Tiger must be, there's no room for speaking your mind...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)