« David Beckham will join the MLS? Looks like PGA will have one less competitorIs 'Coca-Cola's Dance Party Golf Blog' just a golf blog by another name? »


Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Visitor] Email
Right on! As Jon Stewart commented quite a while ago in an interview
with Kristol, Kristol was wrong about Iraq long before anyone else.
01/10/07 @ 10:56
Comment from: patricia [Visitor] Email
"...Iraq's always been very secular."

Kristol was right on that one. Until we took out Sadam Iraq was the most secular country in the Middle East.
01/10/07 @ 11:15
Comment from: Booger [Visitor] Email
Kristol belongs in prison.
01/10/07 @ 13:23
Comment from: Judge Smails [Visitor] Email
Well, I actually have to agree on Kristol. He is a neo-con extra-ordinaire, which means, unbeknownst to the naive, callow bloggers who generate pablum here, that he's tantamount to a liberal of a generation ago.

Of course, Time Magazine is having serious circulation and financial problems (excuse me while I have a good cry) and may not be in this fold much longer. Not that this will dissuade the propagandists from peddling their leftist propaganda, perish the thought. This set will die with their furry pink boots on.

If they really wanted to breathe some life into their listing rag, they'd hire a literatus such as yours truly. But I suppose they prefer the peace and solitide of oblivion. So be it. I'll be there to water the dandelions on their grave.
01/10/07 @ 23:15
Comment from: Dr Felch [Visitor] Email
William Kristol is a traitor and a war criminal, like all of his neo-con ilk. Indeed, there is now NO disinction between the neo-con fascists and the republican party at large. They have usurped it and control it utterly. To suggest that Kristol is somehow the equivilent of a Liberal is not unly insulting to the intelligence of any rational person, it shows complete, confounding delusion, or at least conscious attempt at deception by the so called "judge" in the previous comment. Time magazine in an offical organ of the neo-con war criminal fascist traitors, now even more obviously so. Trials, and, if found guilty, the death penalty for all implicated in this, the worst strategic disater of the millenium, is more than warranted, it is well overdue.,
01/11/07 @ 12:10
Comment from: Judge Smails [Visitor] Email

You obviously are ignorant of what liberals and neo-cons are. Who originated the term "neo-con"? Why was it originated? Do you have any idea?

By the way, I'm not fond of Kristol, but to say he's a war criminal is the pinnacle of stupidity. You obviously don't even know what a war criminal is.
01/11/07 @ 20:03
Comment from: Douglas Watts [Visitor] Email
Well said, William Wolfrum. Thanks.

We are all pounded down about the "meritocracy" of American society, yet we all know that is b.s. from just our regular life. Bill Kristol couldn't do better than the laws of chance tossing a penny against a cement wall, yet ...

Cheers ...
01/22/07 @ 00:50
Comment from: Dr Felch [Visitor] Email
Quibbling over semantics and entymology is totally irrelevant. The facts are plain. Kristol and the neo-cons are war criminals and traitors. They advocate agressive war and torture. Both are war crimes. They shape the presidents policies as advisors, so that implicates them in the crimes of the administration.
Your cowardly attempt at obfuscation has fallen flat, judge judy.
01/22/07 @ 10:50
Comment from: S. Schaeffer [Visitor] Email
Dual loyalty, traitor, war criminal.
09/03/07 @ 16:51

Comments are closed for this post.