LPGA eTour
WIN Free golf lessons with Butch Harmon!
Win a free golf book!

After one round, it's clear - FedEx Cup a complete and total failure

Friday January 5, 2007 | 07:25:13 338 words, 3264 views  

With one round in the books in 2007 PGA season, one simple fact has emerged - the new FedEx Cup is an embarrassing failure. Am I leaping to judgment too quickly? Of course, but face it, can you imagine an entire year of hearing FedEx Cup talk?

By missing the season-opening Mercedes Benz Championship, both Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson gave the FedEx Cup (the “FEC” perhaps?) a resounding “meh.” Of the stars there, early leader Vijay Singh made his feelings the most clear.

“Well, there’s so much going on about FedExCup, I’m tired of listening to it, you know,” said Vijay Singh after the first round. Even better than that was the fact that he was immediately asked again about the FedEx Cup. ” just answered that question, didn’t I? I’m not worried about the FedExCup. It’s a great thing for us to think of when the time comes to think about it.”

At first blush, the FedEx Cup comes off a bit like college football’s Bowl Championship Series, but it’s actually worse than that. What it does more than anything is just add another layer of “victory” onto the whole thing. And give golfers and golf fans a literal slew of rules and regulations to try and remember. And give golf reporters mandatory questions to ask every single interview.

“So, how do you feel about your position in the FedEx Cup?”

After one round of golf, I can say without any hyperbole whatsoever, that the FedEx Cup was a stupid idea that should be buried next to the Edsel and faith-based initiatives in the grave of bad ideas. The “new era in golf” will be a heck of a lot like the old era. It’ll just include a lot of pointless yammering about the FEC and one golfer will make mad bank at the end of the year. This is by no means a fair tradeoff, and, after seeing the FEC in practice for 24 hours, I’ve come to the conclusion that the whole idea needs to be scrapped.

–WKW

Permalink 4 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: patricia [Visitor] · http://www.thegolfgirl.blogspot.com
FEC...just another attempt to get NASCARy. Isn't that what every sport wants... to get NASCARy?

PermalinkPermalink 2007-01-05 @ 10:28
Comment from: Monte Shaffer [Visitor] · http://mshaffer.com
The FEC is an attempt by the PGA to control the top players. With the reshuffling of points at the end, they are trying to "FORCE" Tiger and Phil to play in the events that lead up to their pinnacle TPC.

Tiger when he created his Target event was forced to pay the PGA a fee of $1 million for having the event; reportedly, Tiger said, 'that will not happen again.' Tiger is not a 'company' man, and the FEC is PGA's attempt to use 'golden handcuffs' to help them feel like they are in control.

Like Furyk, I believe the low point total for the majors is a huge disgrace and embarrassment. Those events should have had 3x the total points, not a few hundred points more.

The majors define golf, the PGA is trying to control golf, and the result is the pathetic FEC.

When an organization searches for the almighty dollar myopia sets in and the slippery slope toward mediocrity occurs.


monte

{x:
PermalinkPermalink 2007-01-08 @ 12:10
Comment from: Carl Flega [Visitor]
The FedExCup runup points are only of interest to those in the bottom 100 of the World Golf rankings. The top 10-20 players will be in the deciding four tournaments. The final four are actually just 16 rounds of golf with the winner taking $10M. In 16 rounds scoring average will dominate the final standings. Every one would have given up 1/2 stroke or more per round to Tiger in 2006. In 16 rounds that is 8 strokes! Only the top golfers with great scoring average in 2007 have any chance, points be damned.
PermalinkPermalink 2007-01-12 @ 17:54
Comment from: Gregw [Visitor]
WKW, do you feel like an idiot yet? A writer that makes such a dramatic statement 24 hours into a process is the real embarrassing failure. You do possess the dna of a columnist though in that your ability is limited to screeching about the efforts of others rather than actually accomplishing or being accountable for anything yourself. Any self important moron can have a blog these days, no qualifying exam required. The Stricker story, Tiger/Phil drama on Labor Day, the chase at Cog Hill all subsequent to your egotistical statement have been pretty interesting. By all means, bring back the old way where no one of note was playing or paying attention after the PGA major. That was better? And the fact that only a few people have shot at the title on the last weekend is a sign of failure? There is a reason so many on the tour have gotten fat by showing not winning during the season. They aren't champions.
PermalinkPermalink 2007-09-10 @ 15:42

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

William K. Wolfrum William K. Wolfrum

a WorldGolf.com Blog

WorldGolf.com's William K. Wolfrum blogs about everything in the world of golf and travel, including Michelle Wie, Lorena Ochoa, Tiger Woods and other PGA and LPGA headlines. Plus, he offers the humorous and obscure in news, politics and pop culture.