Win a free golf book!

Smugness of new Masters' boss of no use to golf or humanity

Tuesday May 9, 2006 | 05:30:59 am 533 words, 3634 views  

“Tomorrow night, after tonights (sic) show, I’ve decided to have some strippers over. All are welcome however there will be no nudity. i plan on killing the bitches as soon as the[y] walk in and proceding (sic) to cut their skin off.”

– E-mail message sent by a Duke University lacrosse player literally minutes after a stripper accused players on the team of rape.

As qualities go, petulant smugness is not an attractive one for the leader of one of the most respected golf tournaments in the land.

So when Billy Payne took over for Hootie Johnson as the chairman of Augusta National and the Masters, one had hoped that his ability to handle the debate over the club’s male-only membership rules would have been more adult than his predecessor, who famously quipped that Augusta would not open its doors to female members “at the point of a bayonet.”

The Jasper County Sheriff’s Office charged that Leonard, 37, shot and killed Charlene’s mother, Patsy Riley Grant, a 50-year-old caregiver, on Feb. 21 and severely beat Charlene with the butt of a shotgun.

– Island Packet, Hilton Head

Sadly, when confronted with the issue of allowing women as members for the first time, Payne quickly came off as smug and petulant.

“I’m very much aware of her position on all issues as they relate to Augusta National,” Payne said of Burk, the former leader of the National Council of Women’s Organizations, who had requested a meeting with him. “I don’t really see at this time that any dialogue would be meaningful or helpful.”

Now, this isn’t to say Augusta National shouldn’t have the right to be all-male. It should. Because, in an open society, such issues can be debated, examined, and will eventually resolve themselves to some extent.

But when the leader of Augusta blows off the debate as meaningless, he validates the stereotype that the leaders of golf are overfed, oblivious and self-important. Because don’t think that Payne’s comment was intended solely for feminist Martha Burk. It’s purpose was also to mute the issue.

For a man to casually slough off such an issue is childish at best, and dangerous at its worst.

Violence against women is a major public health problem for Georgia women. The Sourcebook for Criminal Justice Statistics, 2001, ranked Georgia 19 out of 51, based on the rates of violent crime, which included forcible rape, aggravated assault, murder and non-negligent manslaughter, and robbery. In fact, according to the Cost of Intimate Violence Report by CDC, the costs of intimate partner assault, rape and stalking is estimated to exceed $5.8 billion each year.

Georgia Division of Public Health.

Nothing smacks more of arrogance than believing we are some incredibly evolved species. We as humans aren’t. We just aren’t. From bashing a woman’s skull in with the butt of shotgun, to blowing off a woman’s concerns regarding equality, we are not in a position to be smug about anything regarding the rights of women.

So while freedom should dictate that Payne and his boys should be allowed to choose the rules of which they play, having an all-male club requires a singularly important thing – that the club be run by a real man. And real men listen.

–WKW

Permalink 13 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Martha Burk [Visitor] · http://marthaburk.org
Thanks for telling it like it is. We have always said it's a bigger issue than Augusta National, it's about how women are viewed and leaders taking the position that we are second class citizens.
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 09:55
Comment from: golfscribe [Visitor]
William -

To include the graphic - and horrendous - news items with your blog entry was ludicrous. They don't belong in the same discussion; they aren't even in the same ballpark. The bottomline is this: Augusta National has every right to hold the position it does. Period. They are not beholden to justify that position to anyone save their membership.

And I believe that portraying Mr. Payne's response as "smug and petulant" is a gross mis-charcterization. He is simply stating the truth as he sees it: that Ms. Burk and the organization she formerly represented have an opinion (to which they are, of course, fully entitled); that Ms. Burk has made that opinion clear; and that the club holds a differing opinion. Therefore, he sees no point in discussing the matter further.

Where is the problem?
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 12:43
Comment from: Bob Dobbs [Visitor]
Billy Payne's stupidity reinforces the stereotype of the game as sexist, racist and elitist. That's a huge disservice to the thousands of golf course operators that provide a place to play the game and DON'T require you to be a rich a..hole to do it, as does Augusta National. We NEED women to play golf, as well as people of all colors, and the ignorant good old boys who run Augusta National are a huge hinderance to achieving that goal.
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 12:51
Comment from: golfscribe [Visitor]
Bob, Bob, Bob - why so angry? I agree with you - we DO need women and kids, and all ethnicities and races. But there are more than enough golf courses in this country - public and private - that allow the disenfranchised; indeed, that welcome them. (What was the last NGF tally - 13,000 or 14,000 courses, with more being built every day?)

It is no more wrong for the members of a private club like Augusta National to wish to associate with whomever they wish to than it would be for the National Council for Women's Organizations to buy a course or a piece of land somewhere, hire a premier name to design a fantastic track, and establish it as an all-FEMALE club.

The real problems impacting the growth of the game have little, if anything, to do with the small number of elite private clubs in America. The problems are the cost required to play the game, both upfront in equipment and ongoing, in greens fees, balls, etc.; the time required to play; the competition from other entertainment and activity options; and, perhaps most importantly, the golf ettiquette police - seen on public and muni courses as well as private clubs - that condescend and ridicule those who are new and don't know or understand the ettiquette portion of the game. If I spent my hard-earned cash on a new set of clubs, took lessons, devoted six hoursa of my day and paid a healthy green fee to be paired up with some jerk who relishes the chance to slice and dice me because I stepped on his putting line, why would I want to stick with the game?
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 13:41
Comment from: Bob Dobbs [Visitor]
The real problem with the game, oh smug golfscribe, is the lack of support from golf's elitist institutions (Augusta National, PGA TOUR, USGA) for REAL growth of the game initiatives. (The PGA of America being the notable exception). Those of us who teach the game's egalitarian traditions and struggle to maintain a business that allows ANYONE to play the game at a reasonable rate are done irreperable harm by bigots like Billy Pane and his ilk.
Yes, the rich in America can do what they like, but do they have to be such insufferable scumbags about shoving their bourgeoise entitlements down regular human's throats?
Since the game seems so onerous to you, scribe, why DO you play it, and more immediately, why do you post here?
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 15:21
Comment from: golfscribe [Visitor]
Bob -

As you are almost certainly aware, the First Tee is the primary vehicle for growing the game. There's also Golf 20/20, Play Golf America, and others, but the First Tee is the primary program.

It is supported by almost every major manufacturer and every golf organization, including the USGA, the PGA of America, the LPGA, THE PGA TOUR and Augusta National. In fact, the Masters has given more than $9 million to the First Tee since 1998 - including $1 million this year. The PGA Tour has also donated many millions to the First Tee; while I can't confirm this at the moment, the Tour is, in all likelihood, the top supporter of the First Tee.

That sure doesn't sound like "a lack of support from golf's elitist institutions."
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 16:41
Comment from: golfscribe [Visitor]
And BTW, I am NOT smug. Sarcastic, yes, and perhaps even droll, but NEVER smug.
PermalinkPermalink 05/09/06 @ 16:43
Comment from: Bob Dobbs [Visitor]
The First Tee is a real estate and charity deduction scam for the TOUR and its sponsors. While they have made a huge deal about building these facilities, the REAL impact of FT is minimal on actually growing the game. Play Golf America, on the other hand, is an effective, co-ordinated program that has had a significant effect on getting real people and families out to courses and actually playing golf. As I said, the PGA of America is the only national organization doing something real for the game, not just for cynical public relations.
PermalinkPermalink 05/10/06 @ 08:24
Comment from: golfscribe [Visitor]
I disagree - but your argument was well put.
PermalinkPermalink 05/10/06 @ 11:33
Comment from: ToddCommish [Visitor]
"Play Golf America, on the other hand, is an effective, co-ordinated program that has had a significant effect on getting real people and families out to courses and actually playing golf."

Oooh, so rich people aren't "real" now? Hmmm, someone sounds like he's been reading too much Marx in his spare time...
PermalinkPermalink 05/10/06 @ 12:46
Comment from: Bob Dobbs [Visitor]
The rich ensconsce themselves in gated communities and private clubs. Those of us who are attempting to keep quality daily fee courses running to give everyone the opportunity to play the world's most egalitarian sport market to the much larger market of "real" people. As a struggling but practicing capitalist, todd's churlish and typical right wing smear of "Marxism" is a weak argument and disgusting personal affront. This is the kind of elitist attitude that is limiting the growth of the game and the futures of "real" enterprenuristic golf operators (the "real" backbone of the American economy).
PermalinkPermalink 05/11/06 @ 11:12
Comment from: ToddCommish [Visitor]
Oooh, Dobbsie has been pontificating on the Berkeley street corners again... Two major flaws in your "Essay on Egalitarianism in the Age of Bourgeoisie"

1. Since when is golf the "world's most egalitarian sport"? I thought it was soccer [futbol] which is certainly played by more people worldwide, and certainly played by more of the proletariat.

2. The false assumption that "limiting the growth of the game" is a bad thing and that egalitarianism is the better path. Why? This is an unsupported tenet on which to base your argument. It's entirely possible that the excluded class has no ambition to join the country clubbers. It's also possible that they are better off without the accoutrements of wealth. Your misplaced hostility is evidence that YOU want it, but you should place your inferiority complex on the rest of the unwashed masses. [Oh, and I will cop to being "churlish" and "elitist", though not "right wing"]

And if you've seen "Good Will Hunting", I would guess that you're the guy in the bar that Matt Damon humiliates while he's spouting platitudes about colonial economies.
PermalinkPermalink 05/11/06 @ 11:46
Comment from: Bob Dobbs [Visitor]
Todd, don't show up at my course.
PermalinkPermalink 05/12/06 @ 08:38

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

William K. Wolfrum William K. Wolfrum

a WorldGolf.com Blog

WorldGolf.com's William K. Wolfrum blogs about everything in the world of golf and travel, including Michelle Wie, Lorena Ochoa, Tiger Woods and other PGA and LPGA headlines. Plus, he offers the humorous and obscure in news, politics and pop culture.