Win a free golf book!

The Stableford scoring system can add some fun to your weekend round

Saturday August 12, 2006 | 09:06:11 pm 424 words, 4216 views  

A few years back I was playing golf at Cherokee Run, a Palmer design about twenty miles outside of Atlanta, and I got paired up with some Australian’s who were in the area for the Masters. There were seven of them, and as I was at the course alone (I was every day during that spring break of my first year teaching), the starter threw me in the mix with them.

As it turned out, I couldn’t have asked for a better situation. Usually when I get paired up it is with somebody who can’t stop talking and is constantly “quick-calling” (yelling “good putt!” before the ball actually gets near the hole) all of my shots, forcing me to turn to the King for help. This group neither chanted sterotypical features of their continent nor acted the least bit disturbed to have me joining their golf trip (that included heading to the Masters, then playing Harbor Town, the Ocean Course at Kiawah, and Pinehurst); actually, they were just the opposite- they let me in on the little game they had going, and they taught me their version of the Stableford.

As I found out, this is the most common game played in Australia, and they were all shocked to learn that I had never once enjoyed a friendly wager based on this system. While The International uses a different version that actually causes a player to lose points after a big number, the game I learned from the Aussies was much more ego-friendly: one point for a bogey; three for a par; five for a birdie; and seven for an eagle.

It was one of the more enjoyable gambling games I’ve ever played because I always felt as though I had a chance to make a roaring comeback, and my score wasn’t affected by a triple. In fact, these guys didn’t even keep score in the traditional sense- when discussing the round later, they gave the results in points rather than in strokes, forcing me to forget about the negative aspects of my day.

And seeing as Cherokee Run was at the time my home course, I did the U.S. proud and sent them on their way with a little less money to spend on the tasty Augusta sandwiches.

Next time you’re standing on the tee trying to figure out what game to play, give the Stableford a try. You can make up your own point system, and it’ll help divert your focus from the hopeless way you’re use to assessing your round.

Permalink 8 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Jim C [Visitor]
Why not reverse the signs on the system: -2 for a birdies -5 for an eagle etc.? It might be less confusing for fans who are used to the most negatiive number winning the tournament.
PermalinkPermalink 08/12/06 @ 22:21
Comment from: tasha [Visitor]
Good god! You're actually a teacher?! A teacher of what may I ask?

All the more, how do you justify writing your previous blog?
PermalinkPermalink 08/13/06 @ 00:52
Comment from: Dave Marrandette [Visitor]
Spence, you're absolutely right. For three winters in FL I had the privilege of playing with a group of guys who had adopted a modified Stableford. A little different than the Aussies but same gist. Everyone threw a little into the treasury and we played. Once you were over bogey, you were in your pocket. Speeds the game up a lot. Wish I could find more games like that.

Tasha, FOCUS! This blog was about the fun of playing the Stableford System. Nothing else.
PermalinkPermalink 08/13/06 @ 09:06
Comment from: Spencer Hux [Visitor]
Thank you, Dave.

Tasha- I just now went back and reread your comment on my last blog, which you decided to bring up, so I'll try to answer the question.
First of all, I taught high school English.

Second of all, since you clearly didn't really read or understand what I wrote, I'll reiterate. I wasn't saying that Michelle Wie firing her caddie was a crime, and I didn't say it was as bad as anything I mentioned. So, I wasn't insulting people who had actually been through those situations.

I brought up those examples because as a pro, Michelle Wie should not be given a free pass when she fails, or when she acts (even if it is through her agent) like a jerk. I was not saying that only she is at fault for the constant excuses, but rather referring to the many people (like yourself) who constantly come to her defense because she is sixteen, or because she has had success in the last few tournaments, or because she's still learning, or because she an "inspiration to young girls." Sure, people are fired all the time, but does that mean that we have no right to comment on a situation such as this, especially when Johnston was not given the respect that any of us would demand from our employer?

I'm sure Michelle Wie doesn't care what I think, but that doesn't bother me, nor will it keep me from expressing my opinions about her.

That's how I justify writing my last blog. It was simply my opinion about the fact that Wie can't always hide behind excuses, which to me, she seems to do. I was simply saying I wouldn't want the job.

Perhaps Tasha, it is you who takes yourself too serioulsy.

So, how about that Stableford scoring system?
PermalinkPermalink 08/13/06 @ 14:17
Comment from: tasha [Visitor]
You are sounding even more ridiculous with your even more lengthy response. Now who is taking oneself too seriously? Pray tell, must you have your buddy, Dave to "tsk tsk" a response to your blog? Hmmm? You initiated the tedious piece, in the first place, and I merely responded.

My high school English teacher used to say "be precise, concise and to the point" and if you have to reiterate as you did, you failed to present your case well enough in the first place.

But it was good to see that this time, you've written about something fun that you enjoy. That's the spirit!!
PermalinkPermalink 08/20/06 @ 02:27
Comment from: Dave Marrandette [Visitor]
Tasha, Go buy my newest book. And while you're at it the previous one also. I need the money so I can continue to write my blog. I also contribute to the Spencer Hux golf retirement fund.
PermalinkPermalink 08/22/06 @ 09:35
Comment from: tasha [Visitor]
Dave, FOCUS! Remember? This blog was about the fun of playing the Stableford System. Nothing else.

PermalinkPermalink 08/22/06 @ 18:28
Comment from: Dave Marrandette [Visitor]
Tasha, You are not permitted to use that touchee since you shanked the original shot OB. Take a two stroke penalty.
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/06 @ 08:58

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

Spencer Hux Spencer Hux

a WorldGolf.com Blog

WorldGolf.com blogger Spencer Hux writes about PGA Tour and LPGA Tour stars such as Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson and Michelle Wie. He also follows the latest developments with some of the South’s best golf courses, plus balls and clubs.