LPGA eTour
WIN Free golf lessons with Butch Harmon!
Win a free golf book!

Augusta, PGA Championship, or U.S. Open- The race to 8,000 has no winners

Thursday August 3, 2006 | 03:08:37 pm 423 words, 1306 views  

It’s a good thing the Guinness Book of World Records is updated frequently, otherwise readers would be mislead by gross inaccuracies when they came to the “Longest Golf Course in Major Championship History” section. Medinah, host of this year’s PGA Championship, will play to a distance 7,561, taking the place of the former record-holder(Whistling Straits)as the longest course in major championship history. And who knows- with the recent change in command at Augusta National, Medinah might even hold its position for a year or two. That is, of course, until the tournament returns to the Straits course in 2010 and they find a way to make the 18th hole even longer and less final-hole-of-a-major-championship-worthy than it already is.

The PGA, USGA, and members of Augusta will be faced with an interesting predicament in the coming years. It’s as though this decade has been a Cold War-style “space race", with the different committees trying to see how much space they could actually cover with the golf course. It will be interesting to see which organization will allow its penis envy to force players into 8,000 yards worth of golf course.

At some point, the rapid increase in length will have to plateau in order to give the field a puncher’s chance. Regardless of technology, fitness, or performance enhancing drugs, there are limits to how far the golf ball can fly. I recently wrote that the Ocean Course at Kiawah Island is already more than the top players can handle if played from the tips(and I still believe that), but I’m already eager to see if all of the almost-8,000 yards are used for the PGA in 2012. I used to be an advocate of blood-bath style tournaments where the winning score was over par; while I still occasionally enjoy seeing a grown man cry during major championships, I’ve started to get bored when there are virtually no birdies on the course (See U.S. Open champ chipping-in for par on the 17th hole). If majors become as fun to watch as a Keanu Reeves movie, what’s the point in paying attention? Consequently, if people aren’t paying attention, are they even majors anymore?

Not that I condone gambling in any way, but as of the year 2010, I’ll set the over-under for distance of the longest major championship course in history at 7,745 yards.

Over or under? Which tournament will it be?

In the end it won’t matter- as long as the tournaments continue to destroy golf courses, limit birdies, and eliminate eagles, there won’t be any winners.

Permalink 5 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: ronmon [Visitor] · http://travelogolf.com/blogs/ron.mon
"even longer and less final-hole-of-a-major-championship-worthy than it already is."

Not going to agree with you on that one, amigo. The 18th at Pebble is hit in two by everyone today. The 18th at St. Andrews is hit in ONE by everyone today. The 18th at Whistling Straits actually had to be WEAKENED, after the players complained that its lower tee was too tough. Pete Dye came back and built a new, raised tee to let the poor pro babies see the fairway lines from the tee. The 18th at the Irish course at Whistling Straits does indeed leave much to be desired (the other 17 are great), but the finale at the Straits course is outstanding.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/06 @ 22:50
Comment from: ronmon [Visitor] · http://travelogolf.com/blogs/ron.mon
8000 yards divided by 18 holes equals 444.444 yards per hole. That means, essentially, that the par fives average 666 (how devilish), the par 3s run 222 (how relieving) and the par 4s, 444 yards. Honestly, although I miss short holes, you could have two 250 yard par 3s, 1 222 yarder, and 1 166-yard par three. You could do the same with your 4s and 5s, to incorporate the shorter, risk-reward hole. If Tiger hits driver 325 yards, three-wood around 280, that leaves only 100 yards in to a par five, 700-yard hole. The shorter hitters will just have to compensate. I hit driver to the par 3, 17th at Whistling Straits this year. The ball ended up on the right fringe, one revolution shy of a roll-down to the pin. Was it exciting, with Lake Michigan on the left? Heck yes. If professional golfers can be challenged only by distance augmentation, then that's the way to go. Retarding advancements has never been welcomed throughout human history...although we are afraid of where our science will take us (away from god figures, perhaps), we seem helpless to stop it.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/06 @ 22:58
Comment from: Spencer Hux [Member] · http://www.worldgolf.com/blogs/spencer.hux
Ron-
I think the 18th at the Straits course is the worst hole I've ever played at an elite golf course. And the 5th there is not far behind in that category. I just think neither hole fits in with the rest of the golf course, and I don't think either hole has a high shot value. The 17th (I hit 3-wood there on a day with little wind) is long, but it is a fantastic hole; it's one of the best par 3's I've ever played. I feel like going from that hole to the 18th is a huge disappointment. I guess overall it is as simple as this- it's a shame that with the property Dye had at his disposal, he couldn't make something better that was AT LEAST one of the most memorable holes at the course.

However, to each his own. And great statistical breakdown of the yardages. I don't have the patience to do the math.

PermalinkPermalink 08/07/06 @ 20:58
Comment from: ronmon [Visitor] · http://travelogolf.com/blogs/ron.mon
Other than the drive and the lay-up, I like the fifth at Straits. The thing that killed me about that hole was the heat...it's the first time you're away from the lake, and you feel it, man. Did you like the tenth at Straits? What a moon shot! It must be hard to continuously come up with new holes, after you've built thousands of them in your career.
PermalinkPermalink 08/07/06 @ 23:51
Comment from: Spencer Hux [Visitor]
I did like the 10th, although my approach hit the fringe, spun back off the green and rolled way down the hill. I think my favorites on the course were the 3rd (is that the 1st par three?), the 4th (one of the hardest holes I've ever played), and the 17th. Overall, I think I enjoyed the front more than the back.

You're right that it must be hard to come up with new holes after so many years, but let's be honest- it's not like Dye is being given flat cow pastures and being told to create something original.
PermalinkPermalink 08/09/06 @ 14:20

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

Spencer Hux Spencer Hux

a WorldGolf.com Blog

WorldGolf.com blogger Spencer Hux writes about PGA Tour and LPGA Tour stars such as Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson and Michelle Wie. He also follows the latest developments with some of the South’s best golf courses, plus balls and clubs.