LPGA eTour
WIN Free golf lessons with Butch Harmon!
Win a free golf book!

Part 2: Pinehurst 2,Whistling Straits- What really makes a golf course great for the average player?

Monday March 27, 2006 | 08:28:46 am 547 words, 953 views  

If you haven’t read Part 1 of this piece, the following might not make a lot of sense to you.

The first criterion on which I will use to judge a golf course are the aesthetics. It’s pretty simple: if a course has mountains, marsh lands, oceans, or some other spectacle of nature, the pirates will be a plenty; trailer parks, landfills, or sites reminiscent of Tennesse’s Neylan stadium (the previous three are redundant, perhaps) are likely to give a course only one jolly buccaneer.

The second thing I typically look for is shot quality. Overall, the course needs to have several memorable and unique shots that make the round interesting. If every hole is the similar and you could find the same shots anywhere, then there is no need to spend a week’s pay to be bored. If a course is going to receive four or five pirates, every hole must be somewhat unique, and there must be several memorable shots scattered throughout the layout.

Par threes are also a huge factor for me, because I hope that the first hole-in-one I make will be on a great par three, and I really don’t have time to waste my opportunities on mediocre holes. Also, everyone has a chance of hitting one great shot on a par three and making a birdie or par; thus, most players look forward to par threes. In order to receive four or five pirates, a course must have at least one great par three that plays around 200 yards from the tips, because in my opinion, long par threes that are well-designed are the best holes in golf. A course must also have a par three that is totally unique for me to consider it great. While well-designed par threes might be the best holes in golf, they are also the most rare. It’s very easy for an architect to slap down a few bunkers and a tee box and move onto the next hole; to add creativity to 200 yards worth of earth takes quite a bit of imagination.

Another major factor in my enjoyment of a course is the quality of the greens: if I’m paying more than $50 to play somewhere, I want greens that at least offer a consistent speed and roll; If I’m paying $75 or more, I want fast greens that allow every type of shot to react the way that a player expects; If I’m paying more than $150 I want to be putting on glass-like surfaces on which a downhill putt has no chance of coming up short.

Finally, overall value has to be taken into consideration. I want to feel like I got every bit of my money’s worth after playing a course, so much so that I would be willing to pay the same amount to play the course in the future. If there is the slightest doubt in my mind, a course cannot receive 5 pirates.

*A course also has a chance to receive bonus points based on how fun it is to drink beer while playing. It’s not something I can put into words, but I know a good drinking course when I see one, and that has to be taken into consideration.

Look for my upcoming list of courses that have achieved a 5-pirate ranking.

Permalink 5 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Kiel Christianson [Visitor] · http://www.travelgolf.com/departments/authorarchives/christianson.htm
One of my criteria is how much each hole costs me. $18 green fees = $1 per hole. I'll pay that for just about any goat track. $100 = $5.56 per hole. That course had better be pretty darn memorable, for visual and shot-making reasons. $50 = $2.78 per hole. Pretty reasonable, as long as the greens are true (as you say) and the layout is fair yet memorable. This said, I will always seek out the bargains at
PermalinkPermalink 03/27/06 @ 10:50
Comment from: Shanks [Visitor]
Sounds like you golf with buddies like mine. But they have yet to find a course they didn't enjoy drinking beer on. In fact, they even managed to pull that off on some courses in Scotland with no riding carts (buggies) and where drinking is not allowed. Where there's a will, there's a way.
PermalinkPermalink 03/27/06 @ 12:46
Comment from: Toby [Visitor]
AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH MATIE!
PermalinkPermalink 03/27/06 @ 16:55
Comment from: Matt Rainwater [Visitor]
Duff man says ooo yaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
PermalinkPermalink 03/30/06 @ 17:31
Comment from: Eye On Golf [Visitor]
This price vs. quality issue is always an interesting topic. If you just want to brag about playing a "name" course and how much you paid for it, go for it. Just don't bother to tell me all about it. But do check out my upcoming book - Off the Beaten Cart Path.

Dave M
PermalinkPermalink 03/31/06 @ 09:15

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

Spencer Hux Spencer Hux

a WorldGolf.com Blog

WorldGolf.com blogger Spencer Hux writes about PGA Tour and LPGA Tour stars such as Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson and Michelle Wie. He also follows the latest developments with some of the South’s best golf courses, plus balls and clubs.