Win a free golf book!

AT&T National preview: Does US Open form hold the key?

Thursday July 5, 2007 | 04:05:40 628 words, 3433 views  

Okay, that’s enough baby talk. I’m in a desperate rush this week so I’ll cut to the chase - Kent Jones.

He has just about the most perfect set of stats you could imagine for this week’s event: his best this season is a hard-fought 29th at the Byron Nelson, he’s missed the cut 12 times and he doesn’t rank higher that 41st in any of the key disciplines. Admittedly he hasn’t been quite as regular a visitor to Q-school as last week’s winner, whose name escapes me for the moment, but since almost everyone seems to have missed his potential he comes with a tasty price of 760. Remember, you heard it here first.

Guess I haven’t quite got over last week yet. But if the doughty Mr Jones is not to be our winner, working out who is presents the usual problems and then some.

I’ve had too little time to look at this event because of a broadband crisis which at one point forced me to dig out some pigeons left over from World War One (it was either that or smoke signals which I think are banned under the new English legislation). But the blog of Mike Weir’s caddy Brennan Little suggests the Congressional is going to be almost as tough as Oakmont for the US Open (easier greens though). So even more of a lottery than usual then.

The imponderables start to stack up.
Tiger Woods is the favourite (duh!) but he’s had his hands full not just with fatherhood (oops!) but the fact that this is his tournament, needing much of his attention to ensure its success. That can be a big distraction. On the other hand, what with all the July 4 razzmatazz and his new status as a parent (!), wouldn’t he dearly love to win this one. And he was third at the Open. Jury’s out on Tiger I’m afraid.
Phil Mickelson makes a welcome return and we assume that unlike Michelle Wie he has given his wrist enough time to heal. We might hope he’s back to the pre-Open form that had him 3-3-1. A bit of a gamble, but one I quite like.
Jim Furyk still sports surprisingly good stats for one who everyone says is struggling with his putter, and who admitted his irons let him down last week. There’s an essential lack of bite to his game, but he did have enough to come second at the Open.

To be honest, I’m downright dubious about almost everyone. Two others I fear will yet again frustrate are Adam Scott and Justin Rose.

Scott still has me in shock over his St Jude implosion. He then missed the cut at the Open. But he still has a mean set of stats and has course form, coming second at the Booz Allen here in 2005. It’s whether his mind is up to it.

Rose continues to post good results with no cigar to show for them. He’s been top 10 in his last three PGA outings, including 10th at the US Open despite a let-down 76 on Sunday. Come on Justin, pull yourself together.

Others worth watching are Bubba Watson, who’ll be fresh from his fifth at the Open, Fred Funk, in good form and top of the tree for accurate driving, Justin Leonard, unlucky not to earn a playoff last week after bursting back to form, and Jerry Kelly, who must be happy to have squeaked through to Carnoustie and who has had some decent scores recently, including seventh at the Open. And if he can fire up his putter enough, Brian Davis currently looks strong in finding both fairways and greens.

On second thoughts, cancel that. They’re far too good to win. How about Todd Hamilton instead? He’s missed the cut 14 times this season. Perfect!

Permalink 2 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Oliver Sudden [Visitor]
Continuing last weeks discussion, it isn't the Brian Batemans that surprise me but the players that wake up one day and can't play anymore. And there are quite a few besides the well known like Baker-Finch or Seve. Nolan Henke and Mike Bradley went to highschool with my son. Both had very sucessful careers on the PGA tour, Nolan had 3 wins and Bradley 2. Both suddenly lost it in their late 30s. Nolan had been exempt from day 1 for 10 years and had never had to go back to q school. There are lots of players like these two and it must keep the exempt players up at night wondering if they will be next. I wonder what happens ?
PermalinkPermalink 2007-07-05 @ 18:06
Comment from: Anthony Urquhart [Visitor]
Good point Oliver. David Duval also springs to mind.
PermalinkPermalink 2007-07-06 @ 04:32

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

PGA Punter PGA Punter

Anthony Urquhart's guide to betting on the PGA Tour

The PGA Punter, aka Anthony Urquhart, writes about pro golf from a gamblers point of view. Without claiming to have a crystal ball, the Punter offers WorldGolf.com readers views on the players and wagering possibilities that present themselves each week on tour.