« WGC-Accenture Match Play: So what did they do with the real Geoff Ogilvy?WGC-Accenture Match Play quarter finals: Woods exit sets it up for a rampant Rose »

7 comments

Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
PGA Punter,

Please give me a clue.

When do you think will be the next time you are correct about anything? :-)
2007-02-25 @ 18:14
Comment from: RonMon [Visitor] Email
I bet if he lays odds that Alex will continue to be a braying donkey, he'll be spot on.

Antoine, we're all waiting for Justin. To be "the next big thing" is to be a freak of nature...as it is, he's pretty close to being the next Colin or the next Lee, guys who succeeded on the Euro tour but never in America. At least Justin seems to diverge from their path and lay his eggs in the USA basket...we'll see.
2007-02-25 @ 19:19
Comment from: Anthony Urquhart [Visitor] Email
I know someone called Alex, who shouts 'get in there' at the top of his voice every time his team scores a goal. He's been really quiet of late. Can't be the same chap can it?
2007-02-26 @ 04:50
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Anthony,

Different bloke. I was just having a little fun with your losing streak in predictions.

I enjoy reading your blog on golf wagering, something that I have never done personally.

A brother-in-law of mine tried it for a two year period. His belief was that if one were to bet on Tiger to win in all the events in which there was a line, and in all the imaginary matchups,
one would certainly HAVE to be an eventual winner. How's that for a fallacy!

It took him two years and close to $10,000USD to get sufficiently discouraged to give up his quest.
2007-02-26 @ 09:12
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Anthony,

I never heard the term "mug punter" before, but my brother-in-law would probably fit that title exactly. He liked his system, which consisted solely of betting on Tiger, and he was addicted to chasing his losses

In one tournament last year, I believe it was the Barclay's, he bet on Woods to best Ernie for the four rounds, which he won, on Woods to win the tournament, which he did, and on Tiger to win daily matchups, of which Tiger won two and lost two. He still managed to have a net loss for that event.

How did he do it? Because he was always betting on Tiger he had to lay pretty stiff odds. Betting in increments of $200(hoping to win that much per bet), he won $200 on his four-round matchup against Ernie, he won $200 on each of two imaginary one-round matchups, and $400 on Tiger's tournament win. for a total win of $1000.

But by laying 2.75 to 1 on his two matchup losses, he lost $1100.

Net:-$100.
2007-02-26 @ 15:22
Comment from: Anthony Urquhart [Visitor] Email
Alex, he must have thought Tiger was God. I'm glad he eventually saw the light!
2007-02-26 @ 16:07
Comment from: Alex [Visitor]
Anthony,

This is only my opinion, but I think this old axiom applies to all sports' wagering:

If you want to quit sports' betting with a small fortune, start out with a large fortune
2007-02-26 @ 18:29

Comments are closed for this post.

 
Swing Fix