I wouldn’t.
Golf equipment isn’t a very good investment these days. Look at Callaway. It’s stock has dropped 20% since July ($15.71 vs. $19.49), Golfsmith has faired even worse crash-diving 47% ($5.77 vs $10.95).
Two articles came to my attention on the golf equipment business recently: Cleveland Sale Appears Imminent and Huffy Corporation Sells Tommy Armour. Both appeared in GolfWeek Business. For leveraged buyout groups like the one that is selling Cleveland and the sporting goods conglomerate that is unloading Tommy Armour, golf isn’t fitting into their idea of making a profit.
Quicksilver, the current owner of Cleveland because of its acquisition of Rossignol skis in 2005, wants to dump it because the parent took its first annual loss in 15 years. Huffy, which acquired Tommy Armour, TearDrop, Ram, and Zebra when it purchased extreme sports manufacturer Gen X in 2002, later emerged from bankruptcy in 2005 and no longer thought golf fit into its future plans. Rumors are that Cleveland could be a TaylorMadeAdidas target, but nothing is official.
Last year it was sporting good retailers consolidating. Is 2007 the year for golf equipment manufacturers?
| « Tiger and Phil Compete on the Charity Front Too | Sorenstam Gets Hitched. What Does This Mean for the LPGA? » |
1 comment
-
§ joe nedlin
said on : 2007-10-17 @ 21:02
Golf club manufacturers produce unexciting products. The golf industry should cater to the average golfer(100+). We need fun clubs that are not resricted by the USGA. Golf is a game and games should be fun. There is a beter why to make clubs and manufacturers should be allowed to express excitment and creativity.
Comment feed for this post
Recent comments