LPGA eTour
WIN Free golf lessons with Butch Harmon!
Win a free golf book!

Why Can't There be a Double Standard in Golf?

Friday February 23, 2007 | 12:08:37 373 words, 7669 views  

The official keepers of the Rules of Golf are The United States Golf Association (USGA) for the United States and the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews (R & A) in Europe. Periodically they come out with ways to make the game more frustrating.

The latest is a potential rule change for the grooves on the face of an iron clubhead. The R & A takes issue with U-grooves, which according to an article in the Scotsman, “the combination of U-grooves and thin covered balls have enabled elite players to spin approach shots from the rough - thereby minimizing the importance of driving accuracy in the modern game.”

Their objection seems to be in part a desire to protect the purity of the game. According to David Rickman, the R&A’s director of rules and equipment standards, “while there may have been different speeds for different parts of the game, ultimately it all comes together. The R&A has existed for more than 250 years and, during that time, we’ve played under one set of rules for everyone.”

Let’s all dress up like Tevye the Milkman in Fiddler on the Roof and sing about Tradition.

What’s wrong with a double standard in golf?

I will never play well enough to compete at an elite level. More likely, I will never play well enough to break 75. Thus, I will never be considered an “elite” player. Is it going to make any difference to me or the millions of hack golfers like me to be concerned about my “non-conforming” U-groove iron face?

Establishing two levels of equipment is known as the bifurcation of the game. This is a nasty word that gives rank amateurs like most of us as much opportunity to enjoy the game as we can.

In reality, what do we enjoy more: the ability to shoot 2-3 strokes better because our equipment is “non-conforming” according to the USGA and the R&A or being true to the game and shooting another dismal 94?

I’ll take shooting a few strokes better on my favorite course, thereby beating my playing partners and winning the pot, over the psychic scars that I’ll get dealing with my moral “non-conforming” club selection quandary any day.

Permalink 2 comments

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Eye On Golf [Visitor]
Trying to figure out the logic here. Are we doing away with tradition? Or do you want to play a better game based on your equipment not your ability?
PermalinkPermalink 2007-02-24 @ 08:04
Comment from: Josh [Visitor]
Well the greens look a lot slower on old tv coverage so maybe things have balanced out a bit.

If you turn back the clock to promote skill over athleticism then you will see more fat golfers on tv and that will mean less corporate backing, less 'this yea's club hit by Bubba' and the sport will go backwards - progress for some.
PermalinkPermalink 2007-02-28 @ 05:37

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>. Bloggers reserve the right to edit or delete comments. Any opinions expressed above are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the management.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
Grass is green. What color is grass?

Golf Gear News Golf Gear News


Podcast hosted by Bruce Stasch

Bruce Stasch, a self-described guru of golf gear, operates two online golf stores and Golf Gear News, a podcast providing thelatest news, interviews, info and tips. Here you'll find insight into the game that you don't find in the mainstream golf media. Expect him to talk about equipment, club building, gear and other weirdness that is the game of golf. He has played the game for more than 10 years and gives himself at least two mulligans per round.