Woe is Wie! Michelle's first round at John Deere is very sophomoric
You’ve got to give Michelle Wie credit. With six bogeys on her scorecard for round one, the Big Wiesy is still in the game. Even Steve Lowery knew when to quit.
One stroke away from the bottom of the leaderboard (6-over-77) but Michelle maintains plenty of optimism, stating after her sad showing, “I didn’t make the cut shooting 1-under on the first (day of the 2005 John Deere), so maybe shooting 6-over might do it”
Her driving distance was commendable (273.2) but errant but with birdies early on in her round it appeared as if Wie was going to make a showing. With three drops in her first five holes and only making six of 18 greens, Michelle’s approach shots also let her down.
And there were plenty of groans and “Oh, no! You’ve got to be kidding me!” coming from Wie who covered her eyes throughout the round with either her baseball cap or with her face towel.
In her favor, she is one stroke ahead of Bob May who, in the 2000 PGA Championship, lost a playoff to Tiger Woods.
And always look to a kid for an optimistic slant on things. As Wie stated after her round:
“It was very uncharacteristic. Considering that I had the water hazard penalties, considering that I had to call unplayable, considering that I hit my driver like 50 yards right, I felt like I played really well. I have a lot of confidence going into tomorrow.'’
68 comments
Surely, you can't be serious.
"In her favor, she is one stroke ahead of Bob May who, in the 2000 PGA Championship, lost a playoff to Tiger Woods."
So, Wie-Wee can beat Bob, surley she can beat Tigger.
"Considering that I had the water hazard penalties, considering that I had to call unplayable, considering that I hit my driver like 50 yards right, I felt like I played really well."
Are you, like, kidding me.
Now, in all fairness, Bubbles is only sixteen and she's improving. After all, when she was only fifteen she missed the cut at the John Deere by two strokes and at the Sony by seven. When she was only fourteen she missed the cut by one shot at the Sony. My, my, imagine how she'll be playing when she's only eighteen.
I do like her optimism, though. I'll have to remember to cultivate such an attitude in myself and manifest it the next time I "play well." Hey, I hit a drive fifty yards right, shanked a five iron into the woods, laid the sod over a seven iron and plunked the ball into a water hazard, and three-putted three greens. But, hey, take those insignificant missteps out of the equation and I played well. She must be seeing Phil Mickelson's sports psychologist.
She reminds me of the perpetually optimistic child who was the subject of a scientific experiment. They placed him in a room full of horse manure, and upon returning to check on him a half an hour later discovered that he was wallowing in the waste, tossing it to and fro. Incredulous, they asked him about his behavior. He replied, "With all the horse manure around here, there must be a Shetland pony somewhere!"
And that's Bubbles. No matter how excrementitious her game may be, she just knows that a Shetland pony must be grazing on the next fairway.
Thia was posted on the TGC forum where the braindead are a dime a dozen. Smails and Alex would fit right in.
From: henniebogan2 (8 of 8) 7/14/2006 12:05:17 AM
To: czsmithgc In response to Post 6
1)She doesn't compete by her own choice as a full time member of The LPGA Tour.
2)It's been proven that she has not chosen to speak with the tour on this issue. Are you going to tell us that if she petitioned them for full time status as a member that Carolyn Bivens would say no? IF she would, she'd probably be leading the money title. A great accomplishment.
3)But her constant hand-wringing over attempting to compete with the men, which she has failed miserably at so far is damaging her credibility among REAL golfers and golf fans. Her playing record on The LPGA is impressive, but NO WINS. She's been heralded as the next coming.
4)I would think that by now even the most hardcore MW fans would have higher expectations of this so-called "phenom." She's won some money. She's got some top 5's. She's also got putting problems, wedge problems, and now driving problems. She's making a mistake trying to play with the men. I think that this experiment is now being proven to be a calculated promotional stunt which has gone badly. She's playing in a weak field on a short course with wide fairways and generous greens. And she shot 77.
5)Not impressive whatsoever. Sorry, but she's a pro.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I loved this one... Like he has a choice, like any of you have a choice? roflmao
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6)I'm not giving her any more breaks on this. Get it done, or move back to The LPGA.
And then we hear from at Hurst today that there is now way they will change the rules for one player.
Then Lopez wades in today and shake her shaggy and wise??? old head, saying she really doesn't understand why Michelle won't play all her games on the LPGA tour...
And here I thought J.Smails and Alex were the only ones that were brain dead.
I'm beginning to think the whole golf world is a bit off center, several bricks missing from everyones loads..
"But she is so good for the tour and she is bringing in so much money and.. "
Gushed like hell but not willing to bend a rule for their golden goose.
It would certainly serve them right if she decided to go play in Europe or mixture of Euro/asia and any other tour that she could get a game in. More or less tell them to take a long hike, lol.
"But she is so good for the tour and she is bringing in so much money and.. "
Gushed like hell but not willing to bend a rule for their golden goose.
It would certainly serve them right if she decided to go play in Europe or mixture of Euro/asia and any other tour that she could get a game in. More or less tell them to take a long hike, lol.
I know... it's because of all the HYPE or it's because of the Wie Warriors or it's because of Nike's big buck endorsement undeserved or it's because of Sony's big bucks endorsement undeserved or it's because of her father or it's because of her desire to play with the boys/men or it's... never mind!
Any golfer (anyone for that matter), be it weekend duffer, amateur or pro can have a bad day. Remember the PGA professional who was ranked #1 in the world on the men's pro golf tour not making the cut at a recent tournament. No, not the US Open but the Byron Nelson. Who would have thought that this could happen? Seems everyone is cutting Tiger some slack and with his recent performance in the Western it looks like that was an anomaly.
I didn't give up on Tiger when he missed that cut and I will do the same for Michelle or Annika or Paula or whomever. All of these golfers have proven their mettle in the past (yes, even Michelle) and a bad day or a bad tournament or a bad run of tournaments (ala Annika) won't change my view of their past achievements and of their future prospects.
"Get it through your thick skulls"...
You're absolutely correct, she is only 16. She should be playing AJGA junior events and dominating, getting her game ready for the level she is trying now. You have to learn how to win where winning is second nature. If you never had chocolate, what does it taste like?
Only 16 is a worn out excuse. Wait until she is 18 toi access her game, fine, bring it one when she turns 18. She has been shoved down our throats. Sadly she can't go back to Triple A where she belongs...
Tired of Wie...
putt4parr.... Has MW applied for membership to the LPGA???? If not, quit your whining about how the LPGA won't let her play more than x events....
2006-07-14 @ 07:11
hahaha, no, I was not complaining. You missed the point altogether, as most folks usually do..
It's the whining the LPGA does about her not playing more on their tour but by their own admission they won't change the rules so that she can play more. And then they b*tch about her playing elsewhere.
If she applied, you can bet that they'd humm and haw and diddle around with their decision til she was almost 18 and then say "Oh yeah, you can play here now". In the meantime she is playing on any tour she can get a game while the LPGA b*tchs. See the endless circle jerk they play? And then trash the hell out of the cash cow they have..
But then again, maybe you don't understand either, which is fine. Lots of folks just don't want her playing against the men. Or want her to play only in the amateurs or...
I'm sure you get the drift.
Wie has not applied for a special exemption. And if the LPGA is a real tour with tradition, they won't give it to her. It's just bad form to encourage teenagers to drop out of high school, which is basically what you'd be talking about.
If she's "ONLY 16", then fine. Just wait until she's 18 and she can join the LPGA tour full-time then, if she wishes. The LPGA is big enough to wait, and people's lives are surely not so empty that it will make that big of a difference in the scheme of things.
And canine lover is the one who is pathetic. It is Michelle who placed herself in this position. No one forced her to turn pro. She chose this path. So being a professional athlete puts her in realm to be judged as a professional athlete.
So Canine and the other Wie Warriors, stop whining when people scrutinize her performance as if Wie were a professional, because - shazam ! she IS a professional !
if Wie wished to avoid the limelight, she could have chosen the path of the amateur and just turned pro when she was an adult and at least finished with high school. There was certainly time for that sort of an approach.
After all, she was "only 15."
-George
Michelle Wie will win 4 LPGA Tournaments, One Major, and make the cut twice in a PGA event
by the time she is 18. I will bet one Fla lottery ticket on that prediction!! Any takers?
Mike
It would be terrific if Wie could win one on the LPGA tour. That would surely bring more interest to the ladies tour. More people would watch and its popularity would soar.
Stacy, she will start winning, be patient and do not be influenced by the wie bashers. She has done too well this year not to get to the next level soon.
*****
...but her place is and should be the LPGA, no matter what her opinion of Ms. Bivens.
**********************************************************************
There I must disagree, MW doesn't owe them a thing, same as they don't owe her anything.
That is the whole point that Bivens, Lopez and the rest of the LPGA ladies miss. Michelle owes them nothing. They haven't given her anything and won't till they feel they can milk her status as an attraction for more than they are getting now.
The LPGA is as bad as the sponsors and the media , They would like nothing better than to be in control and exploit her exclusively. They are a business, pure and simple. But like any business, they must give a little to get a little and they don't want to bend, at least not yet.
I did see where Bivens is now speculating that they may lower the age restrictions.
Too little, too late for MW. By the time they get their collective hienies in gear, she will be 18 or close, and beyond their token olive branch of membership , they won't be able to deny her that membership and she still won't owe them anything.
just my $0.02 worth
The LET gives the LPGA a run for its money in the Solheim Cup winning a fair percentage of the time. Annika Sorenstam is a member of the LET, she's not exactly dog meat. Biven currently seems to be alienating nearly everyone.
Right now, she doesn't. Neither does Gulbis.
And the "idea" doesn't mean as much as the execution.
"And the "idea" doesn't mean as much as the execution."
Which also applies to MW and to the cuurent co-leader at the LPGA, Reilley Rankin.
I would really love to see Reilley win one.
I knew there was a reason why you won the D*ckhead of the year award. Funny thing, the "little" guy doesn't seem to have improved your thinking or your attitude. You might want to get a "hand" from Judge Smails about now. Cheers, and don't get any heat "stroke" now, you hear?
ok, you can go "down" to the beach now and play some beach "ball".
Oh, and you might want to invite Tim along too ! It would appear He likes to get a little "anal" on occasion too. Now that seems like a more likely Triumvirate in Antigua and Barbuda.
Have a nice day Alex.
Could it be heat-related message board collapse?
And 16 is an excuse. Read this MSNBC article today:
"And for those keeping score, it took Woods awhile, too. He played seven events before he made his first cut, and was 19 when he did it.
“She’s better than Tiger was at 16,” said Joe Ogilvie, the second-round leader at the Deere Classic. “I played with Tiger, and Tiger wasn’t this good.
“Everybody is like, ‘Win, win, win,”’ Ogilvie added. “She’s 16. Chill out. Once she gets to winning, you’ll get sick of her winning.”
You just keep on believing that. What some tour pro said doesn't cut much ice with me. Heck, Mickelson predicted that Sorenstam would easily make the cut at the Colonial and finish about 20th. I could have made a lot of money off that dope.
Secondly, Woods was never hyped at the age of 16 like Bubbles has been. He also never shot his mouth off like she has.
The high expectations exist, Jenny-poo, because the Wies fed the media mania six ways to Friday.
There's a great old saying. To wit, "Everyone reaches the level of his own incompetence."
*There's a great old saying. To wit, "Everyone reaches the level of his own incompetence."*
It would seem that you surpassed yours, JS.
My 4 year old granddaughter is just like you in some ways. She demands instant gratification, when she doesn't get it, she makes the same kind of noise as you and Allex and John D.
Totally incomprehensible but driven by self indulgance.
It's really amusing to see you bottom feeders surface in such large schools.
Cheers!
Judge Smails, "Secondly, Woods was never hyped at the age of 16 like Bubbles has been." No hype for woods at age 16? You are joking? Tiger, age 2, on the Mike Douglas Show along side Bob Hope on National TV. Tiger, age 5, profiled in Golf Digest. Tiger, as a kid, appearing on Johnny Carson with his dad, Earl. Tiger's dad didn't wait for age 16, he started it at age 2. Don't disagree with Tiger's dad doing it just as I don't disagree with Michelle's parents doing the same. More power to them all.
Judge Smails, ""Everyone reaches the level of his own incompetence." It's incompetent to misquote the "Peter Principle" (Laurence J. Peter). We can accept paraphrasing of a an old saying but one should not include that in quotes. More than to Michelle, this saying applies to the Wie-bashers for their use of invectives, hatred, mean spiritness, etc. that spews forth whenever the topic is about her. Now, let me paraphrase the Peter Principle as it applies here: Wie-bashers reach a new level of competency bashing Michelle Wie as is consistent with the length of their "peters." Sorry... that was unkind of me... just hope you Wie-bashers get the drift about your behavior?
For the record, it's just as inappropriate for the Wie Warriors to employ the same hateful rhetoric against the Wie-bashers!
A few Alan Cup points for you tonight. I never said that Woods received no attention; I said that he was never hyped the way Bubbles has been. And, certainly, proportionate to the greater potential he possessed, it's not even close. There's a big difference between saying that a promising boy may be a force on the men's tour and that a promising girl will be.
I don't remember any National TV appearances for Michelle at age 2? Or remember any Michelle guest shots on Johnny Carson's Tonight Show at age 5? Maybe you can correct my memory on that.
Like many others have stated here, maybe the Wie HYPE should be judged in its historical context after she turns 22 (Tiger having won his 1st Major at 21). On her 22nd birthday with no Major wins, no wins at all, no PGA cuts, no anything AND I will agree with you, Alex, george, et al about the Michelle Wie HYPE. Till then, please cut the girl some slack and sit back and enjoy her golf... when it is good that is.
Thanks for the additional Alan Cup points and cannine lover will be disconcerted to hear that I'm surging ahead on Saturday... what we tournament watchers call "moving day."
Alan cannot be in the running for his own Cup. Otherwise, why name the cup after him?
You and the other Alan Cup committee members should be removed from your positions as impartial arbiters. Alan coming out-of-retirement and allowed, by the committee, to compete for his own Cup while the tournament is in the 3rd round is ludicrous!
Seems to me that this decision by you and the committee would qualify you all for "...permanent lifetime status as Imperial Wizards of Inanity."
Maybe "In the interest of fairness" (your words), the committee should award itself the Alan Cup championship as it seems that "impartial arbiters" and "subject to no one" is equivalent to a "hole-in-one" at the par 5 18th in the Alan Cup championship.
Why is it not surprising that when the Wie-bashers are placed in any position requiring impartiality or fairness of governing rules... it, always, ends up the same way... with sad disappointment!
cannine lover's heart will be broken with this news and so will mine. Thanks for dashing our hopes... You meanies you! /s
"One of the things that will make a man" is an interesting assumption considering that I did not give any indication by Nom de plume or otherwise that I was a man. Another "stutter-in-your-putter" to discover that a competitor in the Alan Cup championship was a female... considering the Wie-bashers penchant for hate rhetoric against all things to do with the fairer sex... like Michelle playing with the men!
I am appreciative of yours (and the committee's) notification of disqualification as it allows me more time with my family and less time on that "nonsense" Alan Cup tournament fairways attempting to out-play cannine lover.
My best wishes to Alan on his quest for a consecutive championship in the Alan Cup (Wie-bashers) tournament.
Maybe, you should consider a retreat on your increasing (one might claim "Inanity") use of embellished prose in order to make a point. You should return the Thesaurus to the bookshelf because its use (misuse in your case) just serves to increase your "stutter-in-putter" writing style.
I figured you were female. Alex probably suspected it too.
I didn't realize that women were excluded from the Alan Cup. Maybe one day you can institute a women's division.
"AhhSoo, if I were you , I wouldn't wear that skirt with that top." is a statement of your new found fashion sense (apparel coordination for the female persuasion, that is)? This skill added to your superior debating achievements, weather prognostication on the Illinois/Iowa border (JDC site), "prejudicial arbiter" committee member of the Alan Cup and general all-around Wie-basher is breathtaking!
BTW, I feel that my grass-skirt and coconut shell bikini top coordinates are quite fetching. Please gentlemen, don't get excited as I do wear "spandex shorts" under all that grass. Of course, coordinated, in light green so as not to offend Alex's fashion sensibilities.
Judge Smails, quite interesting that an Alan Cup committee member does not know what the rules are vis-a-vis women where the other member, Alex, does? Maybe, another "Peter Principle" applies here: The left hand does not know what the right hand is doing as regards the Wie-bashers' "peters." I know... not nice AGAIN... My apologies... but just attempting to fit some "allegorical" prose to your situations. Please note that the "hyperbole" employed here is NOT a reference to "size of peters."
Well... enjoyed the reparte but must return to the "female duties" of this household, now.
Comments are closed for this post.


Recent comments