Brandon Tucker - Latest Comments on Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Golf Goddess [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Golf Goddess [Visitor] — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:17:29 +0000

I can’t help but wonder why you nutcases are so touchy about this topic.

putt4par [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

putt4par [Visitor] — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:38:25 +0000

Alex, blind and biased as usual.
Obviously you don't have any real reading comprehension either.
Go back to your knitting, old woman.
Before you do, go read JR's post then do us all a favor, go to bed. and STFU.

Alex [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Alex [Visitor] — Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:25:39 +0000

puut4par,

Do you see anything significant in the fact that you and you alone are the only poster so far on this blog to bring up the name and spirit of Bubbles?

The sensible people are talking about Tadd.

Watch out for M. Tourette.

putt4par [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

putt4par [Visitor] — Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:58:56 +0000

It is so very amusing to watch the Trolls and Alex _bots as One-Putt calls them continue to rant about Michelle and the posting of here round of 80.

Absolutley hilarious how they can wrap themselves up in righteous indignation that she isn't cursed, thrown out of all competitions etc, etc, ad nauseum.

What they never mention is why they would rail at Michelles 80 but fail to mention that in round one of the Ricoh Womens open there were 22 players that posted 80 or higher. Round 2 there were 18 that posted 80 or higher and round 3 there were 26 players to post 80 or higher.

Oh yeah, I forgot, these players have all proven that they can win so now they can prove that they can post ridiculous scores. Why that makes any difference is mind boggling, but then the whole rant against Michelle is so blood stupid to begin with.

Unless you are Alex, his bots and the troll brigade.

putt4par [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

putt4par [Visitor] — Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:17:22 +0000

Micahel.
If there are "all those articles " out there, then you should have no problem posting your sources and the urls for the evidence. If you can't, then don't bother trying to start something.
Otherwise, go bug someone else.

Michael [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Michael [Visitor] — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:39:20 +0000

Sorry typo - rules of "etiquette"

Michael [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Michael [Visitor] — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:38:18 +0000

Hmmm ... no appearance yet by stan or putt4par.

I noticed on yesterday's article that putt4par posted that Bubbles had not broken any etiqueete rules of golf. If he visits today, I wanted to remind him of all the articles that have complained about her stepping through others' lines, being rude, etc.

As a Bubbles fan (formerly), I tried to excuse her actions as inexperience and immaturity. Sorry, she's a brat. After her no-88 WD, I quit making excuses and jumped off the bandwagon.

Judge Smails [Visitor] in response to: Michelle Wie's struggles continue, Tadd Fujikawa's have only just begun

Judge Smails [Visitor] — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:51:38 +0000

I wouldn't be so quick to discount Fujikawa's chances on the PGA Tour. True, it would be a bit fanciful to think he'll be the next Tiger Woods, but the fact remains that he does have excellent potential. Remember that he made the cut and finished about 20th at the Sony (I believe my facts are correct) not that long ago. Of course, it's only one event, so we can't draw sweeping conclusions from it; however, he's not some no-talent hack.

Also remember that if he doesn't achieve success, it will be because of the five inch fairway between his ears, NOT his 5' 2" frame (don't forget about Ian Woosnam).