Tiger Woods feels no need to apologize for profanity-laced threat at Doral photographer
Despite being given several opportunities from an ESPN Anchor on “First Take”, Tiger Woods didn’t feel the need to apologize for a profanity-laced tirade at a photographer at the CA Championship at Doral this weekend.
I’ve looked at some articles online and can’t find any quotes from Tiger with the slightest hint of an apology for his outburst that would make Ozzie Guillen raise an eyebrow.
Even if Tiger holds a grudge against golf photographers the rest of his career for apparently blowing his perfect 2008 season, he should still take the high road and at the very least, offer a generic, half-hearted “sorry to all the kids out there who may have seen it” statement.
But instead, he chose to rationalize his reported “I’ll break your neck” threat. Man, he’s stubborn. How many kids in the gallery are going to mimic that in some way in the coming months now - either on the golf course or at Chucky Cheese’s? You’d think as a new father he would understand the importance of being the bigger man by taking the high road.
Tiger’s intensity may be what makes him great, but that doesn’t give him a free pass to be a jerk. He should let his hubris get out of the way of common decency and acknowledge golf isn’t about verbally showing up other grown men.
| « One of golf's great traditions: the Old Course in Reverse at St. Andrews happens this weekend | Only Emmett "Doc" Brown can solve the Tiger Woods vs. Jack Nicklaus greatness debate » |
75 comments
Sure, handling the media is part of the job of being a world-class golfer, but the photographer crossed a line by improperly interfering in Tiger's work. You don't mess with Picasso while he's painting. The photographer should either get a camera with a quieter shutter, or wait until Tiger has swung before snapping.
I would be willing to wager a hefty sum the "click" was an accident. These photogs are pros (not "paparazzi") but also under tremendous pressure of their own to "get the shot".
Nobody guilty of a simple accident deserves what Tiger dished out.
In my opinion, this is way more of a slap in the face to the etiquette of golf than spitting in a hole, and even Sergio apologized for his immaturity.
To Tiger's credit, he isn't disputing the "break your neck" claims from the press.
But this is typical of the media -- blowing up something to amplify conflict where no story exists. But you got some comments today and probably pumped up your web traffic, so mission accomplished for you. This is a non-story. Tiger is 100 percent in the right.
I suggest the PGA grant greater restrictions to press passes.
Not only is your original premise as flawed as our current politically correct defense of the "rights" of the guilty (criminals, paparazzi and hatemongers) but what does Tuesday have to do with the heat of the moment for Tiger on Sunday? (ref: The #2 comment on this blog.)
If a jerk like Sabbatini can have a paying spectator thrown off the course for a comment made between holes (I thought that was WRONG)then Tiger should be able to get a photographer banned for life. A few banned rude idiots would probably train the rest to learn the timing of their shutters.
That photographer may have broken the flow of a recovery streak. That would certainly have rated a f bomb or two from most competitors.
Understand that there is something called virtue. Does anyone here know what that means? It may be a virtue to stand up for what's right and criticize bad behavior (the photographer's), but it's never virtuous to do it in a vulgar way. There are over one million words in the English language; thus, we can find ones that serve our purposes without resorting to profanity.
Understand also that millions of kids are influenced by people like Woods. What kind of society do you want? And how would you feel if you were trying to instill virtue in your child and then you heard him mouthing curse words because he heard some sports figure do it?
Woods does owe an apology, but not to the photographer. He owes it to the PGA, his fans, the kids and, most importantly, to God. He is lacking in class.
And those here who can't understand that are lacking in that quality as well.
behind the free-throw line! need I say more??
I like Tiger, but there is no call for resorting
to profanity.
Maybe also that is what triggered the bad mood.
The streak ends, I am mad and I will use the excuse to let go a bit of steam. Human.
R U Kidding..El Tigre had every right to call the punk, bad timing photog on his miscue. It resulted in a missed shot and a potential victory. Want a jerk? I took a picture of Justin Leonard walking across a bridge at Pebble Beach during the US Open and he gave me an earful.
R U Kidding..El Tigre had every right to call the punk, bad timing photog on his miscue. It resulted in a missed shot and a potential victory. Want a jerk? I took a picture of Justin Leonard walking across a bridge at Pebble Beach during the US Open and he gave me an earful.
The kind of society I want, Judge Smalls, is one in which people aren't so wussified that they turn into little bitches at the slightest offense.
Ah, your handle is appropriate, as you are lax indeed. That's an interesting phrase, "Narrow-minded view of piety . . . ." I would remind you that Jesus said "The road to Heaven is narrow, and few shall pass . . . ."
You are a typical modernist. The truth is that you don't have any coherent view of piety. Do you believe in Absolute Truth? Do you also grasp it well enough to say that you know what constitutes true virtue? And, if you don't or would tell me it doesn't exist, then how can you make any pronouncements about right and wrong? After all, if you're judging some things as good and others as evil, you're measuring them with some yardstick. And if you believe there is no Truth or you are oblivious to it, you don't have such a yardstick.
Now, if this is the case, how can you say that I'm right or wrong?
Anyway, I don't know if that will go over your head or not, but you have something else wrong as well. Virtuous men aren't weak, but the strongest; it is corrupt people who are weak. They lack manly virtue.
As to this, I'll tell you how wussified I am about this. If a child of mine ever used such language, he'd get a switching (an old-fashioned kind) he'd never forget.
Lastly, I'll mention that we are losing our freedom because of people such as you. As Edmund Burke said, "It is written in the eternal constitution that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters."
Wise up.
Woods may end up with the records and have incredible skills, but he will NEVER be the CHAMPION that the aforementioned golfers were in their prime!!
P.S.- Woods is so self-absorbed that even though he owns his own Gulfstream V, he didn't attend his own child's christening in Sweden with his family! Guess taking a 4 hour nap to Sweden is "beneath him".
"You'll never work a tournament again!"
"I'll have you fired!"
"You're outta here!"
"Nice work, you moron."
All OK. And also OK to get the guy banned.
"I'll break your #^#%#*$^ neck!"
Um, it's a golf game. I don't care how much money
is on the line. The profanity is out of line, and
the threat of violence is way over the top. If
Russell Crowe were to yell this at paparazzi, he
might be arrested for assault.
I don't think "exclusive photograph" has anything to do with it. This was more along the lines of like when someone on "Jeopardy!" accidentally buzzes in and doesn't know the answer. The brain neurons fired too fast or something...
After all, have you seen any photographs out there of Tiger on that hole in his downswing? No way would a photog want to have it published, because then Tiger's posse identifies who did it and that photog stands to lose his badge.
Like I said earlier: everyone is going to screw up, but it takes a man to admit he overreacted, especially when there are scores of kids in his gallery.
I understand the disappointment and perhaps it could be reasoned that in the heat of the moment anyone would lose their cool and say stuff that they would probably regret later. I see no reason why Tiger should not apologise. It’s just a harmless sorry that he has to blurt out, hopefully with good intent. When you are the greatest player who might have set foot on a golf course ever and a champion and a hero for many a sorry would just elevate you in their eyes. It is not an obligation that he has to fulfill but just something he could do for those out there who pray and hope that he achieves success each time he is out there competing.
If we can't even agree on a simple rule of conduct like that, we deserve to fall as a nation.
Tiger Woods must be aware of his surroundings..
it's just that simple! period!
If you think it's appropriate to use profanity around kids, you're simply an immoral man, plain and simple.
Should that matter? No, but it does make a difference. Kids (and some adults) do look up to Tiger and mimic EVERYTHING that he does. His reaction was in the "heat of the moment," but he does need to make some public apology or statement as to why it is wrong. Swallow your pride, Tiger; millions of hard working Americans have to do it everyday.
Oh, and for those here that do not know, the correct phrase is "I COULDN'T care less," not "I could care less." Just some friendly info.
Applause to you, Judge, good work.
PS It may be "I couldn't care less" my side of the Atlantic, but I've never seen anything other than "I could care less" in American English - which confuses me each time.
Thank you. It's amazing how people, after deciding to idolize another, will accept everything he does. It really makes one understand how people can follow the Rev. Wrights of the world.
It's sad, too, because the issue here is far bigger than Woods. It concerns perpetuating civilization, and please note that civilization, properly understood, is the condition of being civilized, not just one wherein people have fast planes and cars.
It's ridiculous, too, because no one is saying that you have to demonize Woods; you can still admire his golf skill, charitable work and be a fan. But we should be able to say -- as we would to a family member we love -- hey, you know you're aces with me, but you were wrong here.
And, again, if we can't even do that, we deserve to perish.
It's a simple matter of respect, respect for the fans and for the traditions of the game.
BE A GENTLEMAN, Mr. WOODS
PS: wouldn't hurt to fix this web site so all the keys on a keyboard work without pounding them as hard as Tiger after a errant shot.
Now ont he lines of another quote from you, "This was more along the lines of like when someone on "Jeopardy!" accidentally buzzes in and doesn't know the answer. The brain neurons fired too fast or something... When a contestant does that on Jeopardy, it is considered that person has the answer, and if not it is not allowed. besides comparing the two with this incident, is like comparing oranges and apples. are the contestants on "jeopardy" competing for millions of dollars, and can be determined if you win or lose by just one stroke of a club?
Maybe PGA officials and maybe rules be put into place where if it is your occupation for photograph events, then there should be a certain distance that these "professional photogapher" should allow to be. and the resolve the arguement of spectators, "NO CAMERAS ALLOWED" by spectators also. maybe this might resolve the issue on both sides.
As for accidents, sometimes you have to make amends for them. The photographer can be excoriated, but Woods should be taken to the wood shed with even greater thoroughness.
First of all, profanity is not acceptable at home and certainly not on national television while 23 million golfers (young and old) are watching. The acceptance of profanity is not dependant on how much money you stand to make or lose.
Secondly, we differentiate between professional and amateur status in three ways: score; financial rewards and public awareness. If you want to be no 1 (or no 100), want big bucks (by winning or through sponsorship), then you have to understand that you're "public property". Tiger earns more through sponsorship than through winnings. He has to deal with photogs. For the money he charges to appear, he has to be able to accept that photos are taken - even while he swings. How will a photog be able to take action photos with Tiger just standing on the tee/fairway/green? It comes with the territory!!!
Tiger is just too sensitive for his competitiveness while wanting the big bucks.
As for the language and doing it in front of kids, they are going to hear lots worse from their friends, movies, TV, and tons of other "grown ups" who are supposed to be role models (like teachers, other sports figures, politicians etc.). Sure it may have been unfortunate if little Johnny blushed at Tiger's heat of the moment comment, but maybe the media could make a little less of a deal about it and no one would have been the wiser for it. Leave Tiger alone, let him be who he is. If you think he is the only guy on tour who swears within earshot of young kids and anyone else who thinks swearing is some sort of moral sin, get a grip.
Reading many of these comments vindicates my assessment that the average person is pretty dumb. I hope your two brain cells get along.
Then, why do you talk about me? I'm not the issue here. Maybe I'm a horrible person, but that doesn't change the fact that Woods committed a serious breach of conduct. Woods' actions must be pretty indefensible if all you can do is criticize those who say the emperor has no clothes.
And by the way, whoever said anything about Ritalin? Throwing me into your modernism group without actually reading more than a paragraph of text is pretty judgmental (ironic enough). I just believe that a kid should be able to figure some things out for their self. Who knows, maybe they'll actually grow up that way.
As for porn peddlers and rap stars (the war example is quite far afield), we won't be rid of them until the market is such that such things are found unacceptable. And the market will never apply that kind of pressure unless people in general are virtuous, and they will never be virtuous unless we start upholding standards. Is that clear enough for you?
Moreover, a parent can easily know that he shouldn't allow his children to watch soft-core porn, but when watching a PGA event there is the expectation that propriety will be observed. Besides, I would certainly hope that we'd hold Woods to a higher standard than a porn peddler.
Then again, maybe your assessment of his character is that he falls into such a category. And maybe that's not something about which you're wrong.
Oh, "their self" isn't correct grammar. Their is plural and self is singular.
Woods isn't being crucified because he cursed, but because he has refused to apologize for doing so.
Anyway, I'm done with you. I don't have the time to educate you, and you're not receptive to truth anyway. You're a reprobate, and a dumb one at that.
Oh, and Carlin is as stupid as you are.
If you say or do something that your momma probably wouldn't approve of, like swearing or threatening...chances are you need to check yourself.
Either way, RTown ftw ;)
If you behaved such that your mother would take (or have taken in case she's deceased) you to task, a simple apology is necessary. I'd include BOTH Mr Woods and the "unnamed" photographer in the 'need to apologize' crew.
Doesn't need to degenerate into a polemic on relgion, philosophy, or morals.
Will he still be behaving like this when his own children (given that he says he wants more than one) are following him on the course?
By the way, if you're going to use a famous golf name for a handle on the blogs, take some time and learn to spell it properly, Judge SMALES.
Martha
Tiger owes us nothing and I'm glad he refuses to talk about anything. Please start respecting peoples' privacy!
for me there is no excuse or forgiveness. let me rott in golf cart of pity. mr tonyd proudly

