I was surprised this morning to read, belatedly, that The International tournament in Castle Pines, Colorado has signed a new six-year deal with CBS and The Golf Channel.
Surprised why? Because after last year’s sleep-inducing 36-hole closing day, I thought the tournament was kaput – finally and at long last.
The International was an ambitious attempt by its founder, Jack Vickers, to create a new major golf tournament, one that was so different that it would capture the imaginations of golf fans worldwide. But it has never succeeded on that level because it employs a scoring system that most people don’t understand, and don’t want to understand.
The Modified Stableford scoring system was to blame for last year’s deadly dull neck-and-neck finish. Yes, I do mean dull even though the outcome was in doubt. If you watched the broadcast to the end, you know what I’m talking about. CBS announcer Jim Nantz nearly gave himself a double-hernia trying to inject interest in the closing hour.
Which begs the question: How many minus-points is a double-hernia?
For those who don’t know or care, let me brief you on the Modified Stableford scoring system, which has been so popular that no other tournament I know has adopted it since The International went into business 18 years ago.
The system fosters aggressive – make that bold, better yet reckless – play on a golf course. It compels players to throw out the concept of judicious course management in a mad attempt to make near-impossible double-eagles and eagles. In plain English, the golfer is encouraged to play stupidly because the reward for birdies and eagles far outweighs the punishment inflicted for bogeys and double-bogeys.
Are you ready? Here goes: A double-eagle counts for 8 points. An eagle is 5 points. A birdie is 2 points. A par is zero points. A bogey brings a penalty of one point, and for a double-bogey the player is assessed a minus-3.
It doesn’t even matter if someone scores a 12 – take note, John Daly – because a 12 is the same as a 7.
The rationale behind the scoring system is that the leaderboard can change as unpredictably as a trailer park in a tornado. But when was the last time you heard anyone talk about unbearable suspense at The International?
Jack Vickers is by all accounts a great guy, which is the only way I can explain how The International has endured. I know the people in Colorado love him, and the PGA Tour players respect him. But the cockamamie Modified Stableford system remains unloved because it robs golf of beauty, strategy and subtlety.
I’d thought last year’s debacle would put the matter to rest. Obviously, I was wrong. We’re in for at least six more years of this craziness. Oh, I should mention that last year Retief Goosen edged out Brandt Jobe 32 to 31. Who remembers?
TravelGolf.com’s Bangkok Al blogs about golf in Asia, Michelle Wie’s fashion sense and the tipping habits of Phil Mickelson and Bill Gates. He also sounds off on the shortage of showmanship on the PGA Tour, plus Rush Limbaugh.
Add to:
|
Archives
|